As Trump builds his power on a foundation of racism and authoritarianism, the medias silence speaks louder than ever, writes DrVictoria Fielding.

IN NOVEMBER 1922, aNew York Timesjournalist, Cyril Brown, wrote a piece reporting that Adolf Hitlers violent fulminations against the Jews had led a number of prominent Jewish citizens to seek asylum in the Bavarian highlands.

But, seeking to pour water on these fears, Brown went on to write:

He continued:

Increasing fatalities confirm that the period of healing in the United States under President Joe Biden is over.

In the same piece, Brown evaluates Hitlers oratorical skills as politically valuable, subjectively claiming that Hitler exerts an uncanny control over audiences, possessing the remarkable ability to not only rouse his hearers to a fighting pitch of fury, but at will turn right around and reduce the same audience to docile coolness.

Did Brown continue to commend Hitlers oratory skills at the authoritarianNuremberg Rallies? No doubt Browns well-informed sources, including the sophisticated politician, were Hitlers Nazi allies and not members of the Jewish community who not that, long after this article, became one of the 6 million victims of the Holocaust.

This playing down and excusing of Hitlers antisemitism as just a clever political strategy to win votes regularly comes to mind when I see the way that journalists excuse, normalise and play down concerns about Trumps clear racism, which feeds his authoritarian attempts to overthrow American democracy.

Mainstream journalists unwillingness to call Trumps extreme immigrant deportation agenda what it is an assault on American justice, freedom and democracy is the modern equivalent of Brown, who I hope was one day deeply ashamed of himself.

Just as Brown admired Hitlers ability to use racism to manipulate, while normalising antisemitism as a worthy political strategy and a clever way to hide the Nazi agenda, Trumps blatant racism and race-baiting throughout his entire political career has been normalised, ignored, played down and never adequately condemned by mainstream journalists.

No doubt these failures are caused by the same reasons as Browns weak reportage: in the name of neutrality. This journalism neutrality, this cowardly aversion to calling Trump what he really is, has been the perfect veil for Trumps rise. It has enabled Trumps movement to immorally use the issue of immigration as a political weapon. It has been the perfect cloak behind which Trump has worked to provoke, legitimise and ultimately weaponise anti-immigrant sentiment to rise to power.

Even once in power, as journalists watched with their own eyes how Trump has acted on this anti-immigrant agenda, ignoring the rule of law and due process, using masked untrained men to disappear innocent immigrant families including children indefinitely to El Salvador prisons and who knows where else, sending in the military to try to squash protests against this agenda, journalists still wont say it.

A recent poll shows a seismic shift in voters views on Australias place in the world after Trump's re-election. Independent Australia discusses why Australian voters are becoming more independent as Election Day nears.

In their silence, they misunderstand that neutrality in journalism was never meant to result in their ignoring reality. Rather, it is a journalistic value aimed at ensuring their independence so that they do not take sides. They fail to understand that calling out Trumps racist authoritarianism is not taking the Democrats side. Quite the contrary hiding the true, terrible reality of Trumps racist authoritarian agenda is akin to taking Trumps side. This failing represents journalists failing at their most important job holding power to account.

Journalists might be too scared to call Trump what he is, but I am not. Trump has created an authoritarian movement on the back of a racist anti-immigrant agenda.

Despite theincorrect orthodoxyaround Trumps rise, which misrepresents him as the beneficiary of working-class votes, academicsMarc Hooghe and Ruth Dassonnevilleanalysed voting behaviour in the 2016 U.S. Election and found:

Let me say it even more clearly. Trump rose to power the same way Hitler did. He used racism as a political weapon and then, once in power, worked to enact a White supremacist, authoritarian, anti-democratic regime. News media organisations like to promote themselves as a democratic guardrail, as watchdogs who hold power to account. They have no right to claim this important public mantle when they are too cowardly to hold Trump accountable for his assault on American democracy.

Just as one pertinent example of their utter failures, in the same was as New York Times journalist Brown normalised antisemitism, never thinking it might be worth critiquing the use of racism as a political strategy, here we have the modern New York Times writing anice little puff piecepromoting Trumps military parade.

Until journalists collectively stand up against racism and authoritarianism by criticising Trumps anti-immigrant agenda, and until they stand up for the rule of law and the democratic freedoms that America once was supposed to value, they are not serving democracy. They are just helping Trump grow and maintain his power. Shame on them.

DrVictoria Fieldingis an Independent Australia columnist. You can follow her on Threads@drvicfieldingor [email protected].

Related Articles

• Brutality and deaths surge again as Trump provokes racist hatred
• AUKUS gets a Trump card
• CARTOONS: Donald and Elon divorce the end of an error
• Hell hath no fury like a bro scorned: Trump, Musk and alpha masculinity
• 'Move fast and break things': Trump's first 100 days